We need a public debate about Policing By Consent in Scotland

18th July 2014

From councillor Deirdre Mackay, Highland Council

‘This is Brora not Beverley Hills and it's a classic example of what we are now seeing at family events across Highland.
‘Since I first raised this issue in June the responses from Police Scotland become ever stranger.

As Cllrs we depend on detailed reports from professionals to enable us make measured, balanced decisions on a range of issues which will impact on our communities. There will be none more significant than that of guns. But we have not had this opportunity, neither has the Board of Police Scotland and neither has our national government.

When CS sprays and Tasers were introduced in Highland full reports went to the then Northern Joint Police board where members were able to fully discuss, question and scrutinise the information and go away content in the knowledge that these new measures were appropriate.

There has been no such opportunity at local government level, Police Scotland level or national government level - and this is an uncomfortable departure from democratic accountability as we know it. Appropriate decision making processes have not been enacted.

In Highland Council, across all parties and none, there was a real willingness for Police Scotland to come up with a level of evidence which would give members comfort in the decision taken. But this did not happen.

Instead Cllrs were given the opportunity, not once but twice, to meet armed officers, look at the armed response vehicle and visit the firing range. This was despite the very clear message coming from Council that the issue is neither the training nor integrity of officers, the issues are the lack of evidence to support the routine wearing of guns and the absence of a transparent decision making process.

We were also advised that there was a ‘strategic risk' inherent in the 20 minute delay of officers having to arm- which we later learned is actually around 1and a half minutes. Sir Steven House had earlier advised the Board of Police Scotland that Highland Councillors were being ‘mischievous' and ‘pursuing our own agenda’.

I have since spoken with Graeme Pearson MSP. Mr Pearson is a former Assistant Chief Constable of Strathclyde. He was also Director General of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency. After leaving SCDEA, he became an Honorary Professor and Head of Glasgow University’s Institute for the Study of Serious Organised Crime. A man who should know what he is talking about. It was reassuring therefore to have our stance fully endorsed. This is a policy not just unacceptable across Highland but unacceptable across Scotland.

Police Scotland has rubbed out the rules and devised a new arrangement. They have created a new Fire Arms Authority without ever discussing it with the Board. So rather than abiding by the tradition of policing by consent as we know it they have effectively created a Department of Police.

We have witnessed Sir Steven House’s diversionary tactic of mentioning an incident to which there would have been no chance of interception unless the armed police had been standing outside the premises. He also chose to ignore the fact that the armed response unit was only ever used to surround an incident while tactical negotiators did their job and defused the situation.

When was the last time there was a shootout involving armed police who happened across an armed assailant or incident, did they discharge their weapons?

So where is Kenny MacAskill in all this? The Justice Secretary is responsible for the culture of policing yet he claims that this’ is not a matter for politicians.’ Sir Steven House claims he can make any decision he chooses - truth is neither claim rests easily in a democratic society such as ours - this is worrying and it is wrong.

We need a full public debate on policing with consent in Scotland. It is not enough to say it is an operational issue this is about a fundamental principle of our legal system.

(NB Cllrs voted overwhelming against the routine carrying of guns - only 9 in favour)

Cllr Deirdre Mackay, Area Leader Caithness and Sutherland, Highland Council.

 

Related Businesses

 

Related Articles

Today : Local Authority

 
Highland's Growth Ambitions: Billions in Investment Promised, But Can the Numbers Really Add Up?

Highland Council has set out an ambitious vision for the economic future of the Highlands, with the possibility of attracting between £10 billion and £16 billion of public and private investment over the next 25 years.   On paper, it is an impressive prospect.  

Today : Local Authority

Caithness Committee approves six Community Regeneration Fund applications - £237,155

The Caithness Area Committee which met (Monday 2 November 2026) has approved six applications submitted to the Community Regeneration Fund (CRF).   This approval securing significant investment to support local projects that will benefit communities across the north.  

31/10/2026 : Local Authority

Caithness at the Sharp End: Broadband, Buses and Public Services Under Pressure

From the loss of a direct bus link to Inverness to uncertainty over rural broadband, a difficult council budget and the future of community organisations, the past week has provided plenty for Caithness residents to think about.  But there have also been celebrations, local achievements and signs of community spirit.  

31/10/2026 : Local Authority

 
Highland Council Faces a £39.2 Million Budget Gap: Will Council Taxpayers and Services Pay the Price?

Highland Council is facing another difficult financial challenge, with councillors being told that a further £39.2 million in savings must be found over the next three years to balance the authority's finances.   The announcement, made at the full council meeting on 29 October 2026, represents a substantial deterioration in the financial outlook.  

30/10/2026 : Local Authority

 
Highland Council Visitor Levy Consultation In-person Events Announced

Residents, businesses, community groups and visitors are encouraged to continue to take part in a series of public engagement events to learn more about the proposed Highland Visitor Levy and how they can contribute to the statutory public consultation.   In addition to the online webinars held earlier in the process, a programme of in-person events will continue throughout November.  

30/10/2026 : Local Authority

The Highland Council agrees budget engagement programme

Members of the public, community groups, the business sector and young people will be invited to share their views on how The Highland Council balances its budget and plans spend over the next three years.   The Council needs to find £39.2 million of additional savings over the next three years to deliver a balanced financial plan, driven largely by the impact of rising costs and the ongoing impact of wider economic events.  

29/10/2026 : Local Authority

The Hidden Cost of a 1% Capital Budget Cut: Could Scotland's Schools, Roads and Highland Investment Plans Be Affected?

The Chancellor's decision to reduce departmental capital budgets by 1% could have consequences well beyond Westminster.  Scotland faces a reduction in capital funding, while Highland Council is embarking on a £2.1 billion investment programme that includes a proposed £100 million education campus in Thurso.  

28/10/2026 : Local Authority

When Fuel Prices Rise, Who Pays the Bill for Public Services?

Councils, the NHS and other public bodies face a difficult choice when rising diesel and energy costs threaten the contractors they depend on.  School transport in rural Scotland illustrates the problem.  

27/10/2026 : Local Authority

Gaelic Spending Under Scrutiny: Can Highland Council Afford Another Post While Jobs Are Under Pressure?

The council has legal responsibilities to support Gaelic, but with budgets stretched and services facing difficult choices.  Residents are entitled to ask how priorities are decided across the Highlands.  

24/10/2026 : Local Authority

 
Libraries, Leisure Centres and Local Culture Face Growing Pressure as Council Charges Rise

Audit Scotland warns that cuts to community services could deepen inequalities, while councils lack the evidence to measure the full consequences.   Scotland’s councils are spending less on culture and leisure services while asking the public to pay more to use them, raising questions about the future of libraries, swimming pools, sports facilities, museums and other important parts of community life.