Should the UK Ban Buy-to-Let and Focus Solely on Building New Rental Homes?

11th October 2025

As the UK grapples with a deepening housing crisis, a provocative question is gaining traction. Should the government ban buy-to-let investments and instead focus exclusively on building new properties for rent?

With over 1.3 million people on social housing waiting lists and private rents consuming more than 30% of household income, critics argue that the buy-to-let model has distorted the housing market. They claim it reduces the number of homes available to first-time buyers and inflates prices, while failing to deliver long-term rental security.

The Case Against Buy-to-Let
Buy-to-let landlords currently own a significant portion of the UK's housing stock. However, recent government reforms—including the abolition of Section 21 "no-fault" evictions and tighter rent controls—have led many landlords to exit the market. Nearly 560,000 buy-to-let mortgages have been redeemed since 2016, and 40% of landlords say they plan to downsize their portfolios within two years.

Critics argue that buy-to-let encourages speculative investment, turning homes into financial assets rather than places to live. They propose a radical shift: ban new buy-to-let purchases and redirect investment into purpose-built rental housing managed by councils, housing associations, or regulated private providers.

The Case for Building New Rental Homes
The government’s new £39 billion Social and Affordable Homes Programme (SAHP) aims to deliver the biggest boost to housing supply in a generation.

The plan includes:

Reinvigorating council housebuilding

Expanding housing association capacity

Creating a stable regulatory regime

Improving safety and quality standards

Supporters say this approach would increase housing stock, reduce competition between renters and buyers, and create more secure tenancies.

Opponents of a buy-to-let ban warn of unintended consequences. Many landlords provide essential housing especially in areas where councils lack capacity. A sudden ban could shrink rental supply further, driving up rents and worsening homelessness.

Moreover, some argue that a mixed model where private landlords coexist with institutional and public providers—offers flexibility and choice for tenants.

While there is no current proposal to ban buy-to-let outright, the government is clearly shifting its focus. The Renters’ Rights Bill and the SAHP signal a move toward stronger tenant protections and increased public investment in housing.

Whether this will be enough to solve the crisis—or whether more radical measures are needed—remains a matter of fierce debate.