13th January 2026
The Scottish Government's 2026-27 budget paints a familiar picture: big promises, tight resources, and a looming capital funding gap that threatens to derail investment ambitions.
For Holyrood, capital funding isn’t just a line in the budget. It is the backbone of every major public project, from hospitals and schools to affordable housing and transport infrastructure. And yet, the numbers reveal a growing disconnect between what the government wants to spend and what it can actually afford.
Official forecasts suggest that core capital funding will be around £7.1 billion in 2026–27, while planned capital expenditure is edging toward £8.1 billion. That leaves a structural shortfall of roughly £1 billion, forcing the government into a position where it must prioritise some projects at the expense of others. In other words, every new school, hospital or road project approved could mean another plan shelved or delayed.
Part of the problem lies in restricted borrowing powers. Holyrood can borrow for capital purposes, but only to a capped limit — currently around £300 million a year and much of that borrowing capacity is already committed to existing projects.
Meanwhile, inflation and rising construction costs are eroding the real value of every pound spent, meaning the government can deliver less than originally planned even if headline numbers look big.
The political rhetoric is bold. Ministers speak of record investments in infrastructure, transport, housing, and energy projects. But behind the headlines, analysts warn that a growing capital gap is already forcing tough choices. Some projects will inevitably be delayed, cut back, or cancelled. For citizens, that means longer waits for new schools, hospitals under strain, public transport improvements that may never materialise, and housing targets that remain out of reach.
The budget also leans on financial transactions funding, including loans and equity investments, to support infrastructure. But these are not free money — they carry repayment obligations and do not replace the need for real, upfront capital funding. In practice, that means projects that depend on these schemes are vulnerable if repayments are delayed or investment returns fall short.
Scotland’s capital crunch is not just a technical accounting issue — it’s a policy problem with real consequences. It is a test of political leadership: can the government deliver on promises made to communities, or will ambitions collide with the hard limits of the budget? Citizens might cheer funding announcements in the short term, but without a clear plan to close the gap, the reality is grim: projects delayed, services constrained, and investment falling short of needs.
In short, the Scottish Government is caught between ambition and affordability. Record headlines mask a structural shortfall in capital funding that will shape the country’s infrastructure, public services, and economic development for years to come. The message is simple - promises are easy, delivery is hard and unless Holyrood closes the funding gap, Scotland’s infrastructure ambitions may remain just that - ambitions.