16th April 2026
Lord George Robertson - a former Labour defence secretary, and former Secretary General of NATO - has made a claim about the UK's defence capability that is not merely wrong. It is dangerously wrong.
His argument is that the Iran War now justifies higher defence spending, and that social security is the obstacle standing in the way of a proper defence strategy for Britain. This video explains why that argument is the precise inversion of the truth.
Defence is not about weapons, budgets, or protecting elite interests overseas. Defence is about protecting people. It is about ensuring people enjoy freedom from fear, including from physical threat, from poverty, from want, and from the social instability that erodes the fabric of a nation from within. By that definition, which is the only definition that actually serves the majority of British citizens, social security is not the enemy of defence: it is the foundation of it.
Take a look at our poll below: • Post
00:00 — Introduction: George Robertson and the defence debate
01:20 — The core claim: welfare vs defence spending challenged
02:40 — What really threatens the UK: poverty, inequality, domestic failure
04:00 — The four fundamental flaws in Robertson's argument
05:20 — What defence actually means: protection vs offensive war
06:40 — "Freedom from fear" as the real purpose of defence
08:00 — The UK home front: poverty statistics and social insecurity
09:20 — Social security as defence infrastructure and military readiness
10:40 — Economic reality of defence: John Maynard Keynes and fair burden-sharing
11:50 — Conclusion: people-centred defence and national resilience
TRANSCRIPT
A transcript for this video is available at: https://www.taxresearch.org.uk