17th July 2026
As a new UK Government forms under Andy Burnham, national media will be full of commentary from “experts” on tax, energy, climate policy, and public spending. Many of these voices come from London‑based think tanks — organisations that produce reports, media commentary, and political analysis.
Some are transparent; others are not. Their views often appear in Scottish coverage without viewers being told who they represent.
This matters because national narratives can shape how issues are discussed across the UK, including in rural areas like Caithness, even when those narratives don’t reflect local realities such as heating oil dependence, long travel distances, or the pressures facing small businesses.
The think tanks most often seen in UK media
These organisations frequently appear on BBC Newsnight, Radio 4, Sky News, Times Radio and in national newspapers. They are often introduced simply as “economists” or “policy experts”, even though they represent specific ideological positions.
Free‑market / small‑state think tanks
Often associated with the cluster around 55 Tufton Street:
Institute of Economic Affairs – strongly free‑market, critical of regulation and climate policy costs.
Adam Smith Institute – libertarian‑leaning, advocates low taxes and deregulation.
Centre for Policy Studies – Conservative‑aligned, argues against wealth taxes and CGT rises.
TaxPayers’ Alliance – campaigns for lower public spending and lower taxation.
Global Warming Policy Foundation – challenges mainstream climate policy and net‑zero targets.
Other influential national think tanks
Not all think tanks are right‑leaning. Some are centrist or left‑leaning, and they also shape national debate:
Institute for Fiscal Studies – widely regarded as neutral; focuses on tax modelling and public finances.
Resolution Foundation – centre‑left; focuses on living standards and inequality.
Institute for Public Policy Research – left‑leaning; advocates social investment and progressive taxation.
Policy Exchange – centre‑right; influential in policing, education, and public sector reform.
New Economics Foundation – left‑leaning; focuses on inequality, public services, and climate policy.
These organisations often provide the talking points that shape national political coverage.
How these narratives reach rural Scotland
Rural areas like Caithness rely heavily on national outlets for political news. When think‑tank narratives dominate the airwaves, they can influence how issues are framed:
Energy debates may ignore rural heating oil dependence.
Tax arguments may focus on London investors rather than Highland businesses.
Climate policy criticism may overlook rural vulnerability to extreme weather.
Public spending debates may ignore the higher cost of delivering services in remote areas.
Think tanks rarely consider rural Scotland directly, yet their arguments shape the national conversation that filters down to us.
A simple way for readers to stay informed
You don’t need to track every think tank. A general awareness is enough.
When an “expert” appears on TV or in print:
Notice the organisation they come from.
Consider its ideological background.
Compare their claims with neutral bodies like the IFS or OBR.
Ask whether the argument makes sense for rural Scotland.
This small habit helps cut through national narratives that may not match local experience.
For much more information and details go to
55 Tufton Street
55 Tufton Street is a famous office building in Westminster, London, known as a hub for conservative, free-market, and Eurosceptic pressure groups. Often called "the other back door shaping British politics.
The building has become a prominent symbol in UK politics due to its influence on government policy and political advisers, particularly during Liz Truss's time as Prime Minister. Because these groups often receive private donations and have successfully lobbied for policies like lower taxes and scaled-back climate action, the address frequently faces protests from environmental and left-wing campaigners.
The Good Law Project - Dark Money In Politics